Can anyone out there please explain why anyone who enables terrorists, contributes money to terrorists, apologizes for terrorists, excuses terrorists, blames the victims of terrorists, and/or otherwise provides any kind of support whatsoever for terrorists, should not be considered a terrorist and treated accordingly?
I won't link to the bastards, but just check around and you'll find them. Galloway. Kossacks (apparently that's what they call themselves). Democratic Underground. Why should we not simply believe what they are trying to make obvious? They are on the side of the Islamists and are therefore enemies of the West, of freedom, and of humanity.
Posted by Ken S at July 7, 2005 11:19 AM | TrackBack (1) |Ken,
Didn't you get the memo from Reuters? One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
Or was that one woman's newswire service is another woman's Ike Turner?
Anyway, something like that.
Posted by: Emily at July 7, 2005 11:21 AMReally though. One of the biggest shocks of the 9/11 commission report is that the way many terrorists fund their organizations is through the humanitarian organizations in their countries.
Scary that.
Posted by: Cullen at July 7, 2005 11:28 AMSo Emily, does this mean we should refer to Robert Fisk as "Tina"?
Posted by: Ken Summers at July 7, 2005 11:33 AMCullen, very scary.
Posted by: Ken Summers at July 7, 2005 11:34 AMNo, because unlike Tina, Fisk deserved it. Even said so himself.
Posted by: Emily at July 7, 2005 11:37 AMPoint taken.
Posted by: Ken Summers at July 7, 2005 11:45 AMCheck out this asshole.
Yeah, it's Dubya's fault. Nothing whatsoever to blame with the people who PLANTED THE FUCKING BOMBS.
Posted by: Emily at July 7, 2005 12:54 PMOf course it's his fault. Didn't he personally go to Dhurk Dhurkestan and train the sherpas to bomb London? I thought that was part of his inaugural speech.
Fucking idiots.
Posted by: Cullen at July 7, 2005 01:02 PMHo.
Ly.
Shit.
He's one that really needs to be glassed.
Posted by: Ken Summers at July 7, 2005 01:22 PMWhen the suicidists blow down his front door, you know how he's gonna go? Hands behind his head, since he's for gun control. "Stand back, or I'll glass you!" What a tool.
Posted by: Nightfly at July 7, 2005 02:37 PMTool indeed. This is why I have been avoiding the political blogs all day. Some people are so blinded by their bendless ideology that they just can't put it away for a day. Not even out of respect for dozens of dead innocents.
Somebody should tell that shithead to look up the word "imperialist" in the dictionary.
Posted by: Emily at July 7, 2005 02:52 PMI haven't found a link to British Government Minister Adam Ingram's full comments, but the BBC report has this -
"In response, armed forces minister Adam Ingram accused Mr Galloway of "dipping his poisonous tongue in a pool of blood"."
Posted by: peteb at July 7, 2005 02:56 PMI was particularly struck by the commenter who suggested that President Bush be beheaded.
Posted by: Ken Summers at July 7, 2005 03:01 PMI'm glad people are sticking it to Galloway...
Ken,
I know. Hateful prick.
Don't forget Lord mayor Livingstone on your list.
Lord Mayor Livingstone, how will you ever look into the eyes of the families that lost loved ones yesterday when you have welcomed this evil man who is a major shareholder in a bank alleged to be part of al-Qa’eda’s fund-raising network into your home and treated him as a gentleman?
for more check the trackback..
Posted by: Brent Colbert at July 7, 2005 07:53 PMBrent, while I agree with your sentiments, Livingstone is the Mayor of London, not the Lord Mayor of the City of London. FYI: http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/Corporation/business_city/lordmayor/
Posted by: Dave J at July 7, 2005 08:40 PMDon't take it personally, Brent. He's always this way. Lawyers - whaddya gonna do?
Posted by: Ken Summers at July 7, 2005 08:53 PMAlas, CoV vicars are not waiting before saying moronic things.
Posted by: Andrew Ian Dodge at July 8, 2005 04:34 AM"Praise the Lord and pass the white flag"
Posted by: Ken Summers at July 8, 2005 05:54 AM