It's what's for dinner.
Via Cassandra.
You now have 10 hours (and counting) to denounce this post, only three and a half hours to condemn Cassandra's post. It's too late to condemn Patterico's post. I condemn you for not condemning it in a timely fashion.
Posted by Ken S at July 19, 2006 01:00 PM | TrackBack (0) |Wait...I thought blogs were under orders not to talk about that Glenn guy? Or is it okay to talk about him if you condemn him? Or will I just be condemned for not condemning him?
I'm so confused.
Posted by: Emily at July 19, 2006 01:26 PMI thought blogs were under orders not to talk about that Glenn guy?
Sadly, No
Or is it okay to talk about him if you condemn him?
Sadly, No
Or will I just be condemned for not condemning him?
Sadly, No
I hope that helps.
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at July 19, 2006 01:32 PMNope. More confused than ever. But that could be the drugs.
Posted by: Emily at July 19, 2006 01:44 PMI condemn misspellings.
Posted by: Lisa, True Crime's Whore at July 19, 2006 01:52 PMAnd I condemn your condamnation!
Posted by: Emily at July 19, 2006 01:55 PMAnd I condemn well laugh at the whole thing.
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at July 19, 2006 01:59 PMDon't you condemn me, condemn it! I condemn myself!
Posted by: Cullen at July 19, 2006 02:22 PMI do have a question about my new obligation to condemn everyone who writes something tacky or inappropriate on the internet...just how many hours a day am I expected to spend hunting for said offenses? I mean, since I didn't actually *read* the originally Misha post when it was up, am I exempt from condemning? Or am I supposed to now check nicedoggie.net on a daily basis to make sure that something condemnworthy hasn't been posted? How many sites that I don't read now am I also expected to do this?
Can I just issue a blanket condemnation for the entire internet? 'Cause that stuff sounds kind of exhausting.
Posted by: Emily at July 19, 2006 02:37 PMI condemn your condiments.
Posted by: Masked Menace© at July 19, 2006 02:40 PMThe first rule of Conservative blogs is- you do not condemn Conservative blogs...
Geez, how often do I have to remind y'all of this. It's like you're not listening at any of the weekly meetings!
Posted by: JFH at July 19, 2006 03:48 PMThere are meetings?!?!?!
Posted by: Emily at July 19, 2006 03:59 PMI condemn the meetings!!!
Posted by: Cullen at July 19, 2006 04:39 PMMeetings would be safer if people used condemns.
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at July 19, 2006 05:11 PMMaybe you could just issue a 'blanket' condemnation for sites.
I hereby condemn anything condemnable that anyone (including me) posts, here or on any other blog. Or forum. Or whatever. Does that cover everything?
I condemn you all yet again!
Posted by: lord Xenu, Condemner Of Cretans at July 19, 2006 05:22 PMI've never even been to Crete.
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at July 19, 2006 06:45 PMThere's a NAKED MAN!
I'm confused. I was expecting Ralph Reed.
Posted by: Even Covered in Mustard Bingley Couldn't Tempt the Most Desperate of New Orleans Cannibals to Try a Bite at July 19, 2006 08:30 PMDude, don't ever type the words "naked" and "Ralph Reed" within ten feet of each other again.
Posted by: Emily at July 20, 2006 06:03 AMCondeming is a waste of air, you just got to get to work with the rope.
Posted by: DirtCrashr at July 20, 2006 08:18 AMOK - there's a little bit of a disconnect, here.
...don't ever type the words "naked" and "Ralph Reed" within ten feet of each other again.
The VERY NEXT POST reads:
...several videos involving breasts, and a post about Cynthia McKinney.
And friends, I don't need to tell you that after that image I won't be able to sleep until next Tuesday.
I condemn this inconsistency!
Posted by: Nightfly at July 20, 2006 08:20 AMThey make pills for that now, Nightfly.
Posted by: Emily at July 20, 2006 08:35 AMHeh. If they work, Emily, does that mean that I fall asleep on the can?
Posted by: Nightfly at July 20, 2006 09:57 AMIf that's where you take them, though I'd think the similar passing of Elvis Presley in such a fashion would bode as a warning of sorts.
Posted by: Emily at July 20, 2006 09:58 AM