it comes in pints?

Do you like cats? WTF? Was Hitler a cat lover or something?

I'm not fond of cats myself (with rare exceptions). That makes me a Nazi.

I tell the truth. Take me to the Hague.

Hitler liked dogs from what I remember, German Shepards, and believed in homeopathic medicine too or at least fringe vegetarianism.
Why the hell anybody would ever believe in homeopathic anything is beyond me. It's as close to believing in "sympathetic magic" and "elvish charms" as it gets.

Seig Heil, baby.

What about banjos?

Banjos rock. People who hate banjos are Nazis. Also, they're communists and may be suspected of defiling satirical corpses.

Ken, that's exactly the kind of comment a Nazi despot banjo lover would make.

On the Monarchy thing - Austrilla is like Canada, their PM is head of government but they recognize the British Crown as their head of state. Technically, their elections are called for by the Queen and the PM is suppose to report to her and yadda yadda yadda.

I'm confused about something though... if you'd kill in self defense, you're not a Nazi, but if you study martial arts so you might not have to kill (or could kill more easily) in self defense, you are a Nazi. My old sensis would be very upset about this.

It's really simple - "if you don't agree with me in all things you're a Nazi."

That's usually the case, Ktel, but some of these are complete non-sequitors. Do you know who Rupert Murdoch IS? Yeah, he's one of the most famous fucking men in the world. I could possibly understand a question like "do you ADMIRE Rupert Murdoch" or something along those lines, but just have you heard of him? Huh? Who hasn't?

Let's conjoin these two statements:

If you would not kill in self-defense, you're a Nazi

If you do martial arts, you're a Nazi

I think it makes them the Naziest of Nazis. Or at least, it makes them extra-sooper-double Nazis.

Which brings up a question, if the pet you kicked was a cat, would that count as two Nazi points?

I know who Rupert is, he's the bastard who's homunculus man-boy Jeff Shell at TV-Guide took over the company where I worked and after booting Henry and Elsie with golden goddam parachutes, closed down the eBook venture because he was running a Haircut-500 company of nitwits who pretended to be TV people - a corporate practice company where they groom talent for other jobs.

oh, that kind of thing had hair on it back in the Vaudeville days. There was the old question: "So have you stopped beating your wife?"

I don't know, though. If I see the word "Nazi" out of the context of a discussion of the Reich or WWII, I tend to tune out whatever follows. I've kind of internalized Godwin's Law.

"Australia is like Canada, their PM is head of government but they recognize the British Crown as their head of state."

To really splits hairs about it, the monarchy is fully patriated to each of the dominions: the Crown is NOT "the British Crown," because Elizabeth II is Queen of Australia (or Canada), etc., as such, just as much she is Queen of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. This has been true to an extent since at least the Statute of Westminster in 1931, but completely the case since each of the dominions adopted their (unlike the UK's) written constitutions. When absent (i.e., most of the time), the monarch is represented by the Governor-General at the federal level, and by a Lieutenant-Governor in each of the Australian states (and Canadian provinces). To illustrate, a federal criminal prosecution is captioned "the Crown in Right of Australia v." the defendant, and a state prosecution would be (for example) "the Crown in Right of New South Wales v." the defendant. A civil action between a state or province and the feds is particularly weird, e.g., "the Crown in Right of Alberta v. the Crown in Right of Canada."

This is also why these countries do not have accredit ambassadors and embassies to one another, since an ambassador represents a sovereign head of state or the equivalent. Instead they have "high commissions."

SPLIT THOSE HAIRS, BABY!

Now come on, I believe that conspiracy theory that says the Clintons did away with anyone and everyone who had something on them. Or I believed it for about 5 or 10 minutes... well maybe a day or 2 at the most....

Although I'm alergic to most cats, so that probably evens things out some.

Clintons killed the radio star, I hear.

I thought the Monarchy thing had to do with the fact that Liberals are so fucking convinced the George W had crowned himself King/emperor. (I need to get away from college.... I've actually HEARD that argument SERIOUSLY put forward in a class.)

Did you ever use alternative medicine?

I thought that was a lefty sort of activity.