This one on geekitude. I got tagged by Bitterroot of Friction and Harmony on this geek test. [Grr. Link fixed]
Surprisingly (but only marginally so, I'm really more in nerd territory), I scored only
24.45759% - Geek
The very fact that I reported it to seven significant figures should have pushed it over into the next category.
Now, the potential scorings demonstrate severe geekosity:
+ Geekish Tendencies................................≥09%Note that it was a non-geek (or at least, a marginal geek) who devised the categories. A true geek, or at least a true nerd, would have know that "total" beats "extreme". But we are nothing if not forgiving and we shall not dwell on this.
++ Geek.............................................≥15%
+++ Total Geek......................................≥25%
++++ Major Geek.....................................≥35%
+++++ Super Geek....................................≥45%
++++++ Extreme Geek.................................≥55%
+++++++ Geek God....................................≥65%
+++++++! Dysfunctional Geek.........................≥75%
Anyway, my score puts me in the second-from-bottom category, which suits me just fine. I revel in my nerditude but if the particular things that make one geekish are those here, I am happy to be so non-geeky. Some comments in the extended entry:
For example, I don’t do Star Trek. I have nothing in particular against those who like it (or even live it), but that ain't me and I wouldn't want my sister to marry on. A little less so for SCA, though I am just barely geeky enough to know what it is. Were I to get involved in historical reenactment it would be American History (say, Civil War or Revolution, or maybe WWII). Nothing against the Renaissance Fairies but it just isn't my bag.
Same for collecting. I collect guns. Well, actually, I would collect guns if I had the time and money. But I would not collect: comic books , superhero paraphernalia , spoons , calculators , vintage computers , bugs , trains , pins , snow globes , neat-looking rocks , stamps , coins , dirt. Actually, I do sort of collect coins but not in any systematic way.
More: I don't do sci-fi at all, even books, with very rare exceptions. Time travel is an exception, as are non-time-travel works by Robert Heinlein. I love time travel books and stories, especially those that bend the mind, but otherwise I am fairly indifferent to sci-fi. But I clicked the box for Isaac Asimov because I absolutely LOVE the essays he wrote for the "Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction".
On the other hand, I do math problems for fun when I have the time. I still work when I can with MathCounts when I get the chance. Yes, I do math. And I like it.
Hmm. In a bow to geekitude, I suppose I should actually tag people. Five, I guess, is the right number, but I have only three that come to mind at the moment. I'll add more later. Tagging:
UPDATE: Two more tags because they strike me as being rather geeky in their own way:
Posted by Ken S at February 11, 2007 06:17 PM | TrackBack (0) |Thanks for joining in... Good call on tagging CalTechGirl. I would have, but I was curious to see how the guys would do.
Interestingly enough, a woman just bested(?) me by scoring over 49%. Go figure. ;)
Posted by: Bitterroot at February 11, 2007 06:46 PMWell, I got 36.88363% - Major Geek.
Did you put "yes" for playing with hazardous chemicals?
And, from my days as a Chem E major (I got better) I know the absolute scale equivalent to Kelvin for the English System - that alone should have netted me 5 more points.
You're right, this was too heavy on the computer geek / Trekkie stuff. I do hard SF. I do not do Trek.
There should have been more engineering stuff like: "have you ever made a cage for an egg out of popsicle sticks and dropped it off the top of a building to test your civil engineering skills?", and "have you ever made your own explosives? and gone fishing with them?"
Posted by: John at February 11, 2007 06:47 PMOh, I absolutely put yes for hazchems. And I know four temp scales with corresponding water FPs.
However, I have not made my own explosives.
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at February 11, 2007 08:07 PM23.27% Geek - and I even got lots of bonus points for being a female geek. I daresay I'm up there far enough to be closing in on a "Total Geek."
I feel proud!
Posted by: Susanna at February 11, 2007 08:15 PMI only got 14.00394%. I think I would've scored more if I'd stayed married to you-know-who.
Posted by: Julie at February 11, 2007 09:29 PMExplosives! Why weren't those on the test?! I damn near took out my friend's dad (and his classic Mustang) when he drove out to find his son. He deliberately swerved toward the bucket we were running from with a big smile on his face - like he was going to run it over, but 'missed it just in time'. Heh. He about shit himself when the bucket (filled with water) launched about ten feet into the air right beside his door (and open window). He hit the gas out of reflex and nearly plowed through the fence at the end of the lot. While my friend was running toward his dad to see if he was okay, I - sick bastard that I am - was doubled over laughing. ;)
Posted by: Bitterroot at February 12, 2007 05:11 AMKen,
Your link highlighted under "geek test" is a link to us...
Thanks for catching that, I didn't copy in the url.
Just got a message back from Daughter Number Two, to whom I sent the test: "I'm a geek god, with just over 70%. Worship me."
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at February 12, 2007 05:27 AM20.9073% Mainly I think because I'm not into sci-fi or fantasy and I'm not very knowledgable about computers.
And I wrote about it on my blog.
Posted by: ricki at February 12, 2007 05:34 AMI love that one of the questions is have you "studied an artificial language (such as Klingon)"
Hahahaha.
And the first author they asked about was Douglas Adams. Yah! I scored pretty low, considering I'd seen every movie they asked about. Twice. At least.
Posted by: Emily at February 12, 2007 05:42 AMI got 27.416...ugh that is pretty bad.
Posted by: Andrew Ian Dodge at February 12, 2007 06:24 AMI scored 30.76923% - Total Geek
I am comforted by the fact that John's score was significantly higher...
"23.27416% - Geek" for me.....alas! And I even own a vintage computer, a Tandy 100 laptop, with a 3 line x 40 column LCD, all caps QWERTY keyboard, and 2KB of RAM, woo hoo! I use it for packet radio demonstrations....works great!
Guess I should have lied, huh?
Posted by: The_Real_JeffS at February 12, 2007 07:11 AM39.44773% - Major Geek. Scary that I would score higher than Ken, given my lack of science background. But the comic books, RPG's, scifi, random trivia and fact that, yes, I was a theater techie in high school, might explain some of it.
"have you ever made a cage for an egg out of popsicle sticks and dropped it off the top of a building to test your civil engineering skills?"
I did that in seventh grade, but it was for class so I wouldn't count it even if they asked. Oh, and while my interest and appreciation for Trek has fallen off dramatically, I admittedly did used to be a serious geek about it. I definitely do more hard SF now, but I'm still the sort of person who'll give a million reasons why Babylon 5 was such a better show, and be semi-serious about the argument.
"I love that one of the questions is have you "studied an artificial language (such as Klingon)""
I totally think they need to have individual checkboxes for at least few fictitious languages. I mean, I've probably paid closer attention to Tolkien's languages than to the real ones I've attempted to study.
Posted by: Dave J at February 12, 2007 07:20 AMI used to write letters to friends using tengwar and cirth characters.
Posted by: Mr. Bingley at February 12, 2007 07:39 AMOh, Bingley. That's just sad.
Posted by: Emily at February 12, 2007 07:46 AMDid they ever write back? :-P
Posted by: Dave J at February 12, 2007 08:02 AMIt was a long time ago (1979 or so). My only excuse is I was very young. And Carter was president; I needed an escape from the national mayonnaise that he said was gripping America.
And yes, they did write back.
Posted by: Mr. Bingley at February 12, 2007 08:46 AMI scored 40.03945% -- Major Geek.
I protest. A damn physics PhD ought to net you more geek points that playing a zillion silly games.
And they didn't even ask about Zork. Plugh!
I used to write letters to friends using tengwar and cirth characters.
When I was a teenager I started inventing an alphabet. The idea was that there would be one letter for each sound and vice versa, because I believe in phonetic spelling, dammit. Also, the letters were going to be rationally formed, consisting of only lines and circles (or arcs).
The consonants went swimmingly, but I hit a hard wall when it came to the vowels. I found I didn't actually know how many sounds there were. (Are ah and aw the same sound? Are those different from short o?) Apparently linguists have this all nailed down now, but I didn't know that then.
And that's before I started learning Russian, and encountered the dreaded Ы.
I never told anybody about this, because they would've had me put away.
Actually, I do sort of collect coins but not in any systematic way.
And this, Grasshopper, is why you will never achieve Total Geekitude.
Posted by: Angie Schultz at February 12, 2007 08:50 AM4.73373% - Poser
Holy shit. I wouldn't have looked twice at you guys in high school OR college! Well, if I needed you to write me a program in Cobol, I might've shown you my boobs, but that was just once. :)
But tengwar? Cirth letters? KLINGON? Did you also play with 17-sided dice in your mom's basement on Friday nights? I just want to cry.
(I keed! I keed! Well, except for that Cobol thing. I totally did that.)
Posted by: Lisa at February 12, 2007 08:51 AMhahahahahahahahahaha!
and the dice come in 4, 6, 10, 12 and 20 side versions...
Posted by: Mr. Bingley at February 12, 2007 08:58 AMoops, and 8-sided, too.
Posted by: Mr. Bingley at February 12, 2007 08:58 AMSomehow that doesn't make me feel any better.
And my bride and I did listen to "Teach yourself Klingon" tapes in the car while driving down to Norf Cackalacky to visit THS 10 or 11 years ago.
Posted by: Mr. Bingley at February 12, 2007 09:06 AMBingley, I would expect you of all people to know that they have actually made 100-sided dice as well.
Posted by: Dave J at February 12, 2007 09:09 AMThere are "Teach Yourself Klingon" tapes?!?!!?!?
Posted by: Emily at February 12, 2007 09:12 AMNot in my day, Dave. You would roll 2 d10 to get your percentages.
I'll see if I can find the tapes and scan the box tonight, but it was something like this.
Posted by: Mr. Bingley at February 12, 2007 09:36 AMOh, I did that, too, Mr. B. I'm not saying I ever actually OWNED a d100. They're more a novelty item than something that would ever get used.
Posted by: Dave J at February 12, 2007 09:37 AM100 sided dice? Isn't that, basically, a golf ball?
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at February 12, 2007 09:42 AMSort of yes, Ken.
Posted by: Dave J at February 12, 2007 09:55 AMYou realize, I hope, that it cannot be a fair die since it is not a regular polyhedron. I don't know the configuration but at best, half of the numbers are more likely than the other half (and depending on the configuration, it may break down in more categories of different probabilities).
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at February 12, 2007 10:04 AMI never said it could or was a fair die, or that I've used one. Just that they exist. :-P
Posted by: Dave J at February 12, 2007 11:07 AMIt's like a Magic 8 Ball, only with numbers!
hahahahaha. I had friends (oh, hell, BOYfriend) who was into D&D and used to go into endless discourses on the many sided dice and the various attributes of characters. Man, he could talk about it for hours.
(I was in junior high at the time. I would like to think I would be a bit more discerning now)
Posted by: ricki at February 12, 2007 11:07 AMricki - hopefully he would be, too. Anyone who did D&D beyond junior high needs another 20 points added to their score. The IDF does not take D&D gamers becuase they think it is a sign of a weak mind.
Posted by: John at February 12, 2007 01:39 PM