Actually, this one edges across that fine line between irony and chutzpah.
Edwards charges $55,000 to speak to UC Davis students about povertyAirfare? Isn't he a global warmmonger?Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, who as a Democratic presidential candidate recently proposed an educational policy that urged "every financial barrier" be removed for American kids who want to go to college, has been going to college himself -- as a high paid speaker, his financial records show.
The candidate charged a whopping $55,000 to speak at to a crowd of 1,787 the taxpayer-funded University of California at Davis on Jan. 9, 2006 last year, Joe Martin, the public relations officer for the campus' Mondavi Center confirmed Monday.
That amount -- which comes to about $31 a person in the audience -- included Edwards' travel and airfare, and was the highest speaking fee in the nine appearances he made before colleges and universities last year, according to his financial records.
The earnings -- though made before Edwards was a declared Democratic presidential candidate -- could hand ammunition to his competition for the Democratic presidential nomination.Ya think?
The candidate -- who was then the head of the Center on Poverty, Work and Opportunity at the University of North Carolina -- chose to speak on "Poverty, the great moral issue facing America," as his $55,000 topic at UC Davis.I guess he's solved his own personal poverty issue.
That could cause both parents and students to note some irony here: UC Davis -- like the rest of the public University of California system -- will get hit this year by a 7 percent tuition increase that likely hits many of the kids his speeches are aimed at helping.$55,000 to listen to a politician. No wonder they have to increase tuition.
We wondered if this is Edwards' going speaking rate, and how come he didn't offer to do it gratis for a college, particularly a public institution.I wonder about that too. What say you, John?
He said UC Davis' Mondavi Center paid Edwards because at the time "he wasn't a (presidential) candidate and from our point of view, he was a speaker of interest that people in the community were clearly interested in ... we feel it's our mission to present those speakers."Here's an interesting thought: Let the ones who are interested pay for it. There are far more than 1,787 students on campus, so it seems that a lot weren't interested. But their tuition is going up just the same.
In 2006, records show Edwards made more than $285,000 speaking to nine colleges and universities, charging between $16,000 and Davis' $55,000 for his talks. They ranged from the $12,000 he got on Jan. 10, 2006 from Gonzaga University Law School in Seattle to the $40,000 he banked from the University of Texas Pan American Foundation on May 22, 2006. Other schools that have paid Edwards to speak before he was a declared presidential candidate: Hunter College in New York ($35,000), Mount Union College in Ohio ($16,00) and Vanderbilt University in Nashville ($40,000).Apologies for excerpting so much. It was just too delicious. Posted by Ken S at May 22, 2007 06:16 AM | TrackBack (0) |Posted By: Carla Marinucci (Email) | May 21 2007 at 03:24 PM
Irony? You sure you didn't mean "blatant hypocrisy"?
Posted by: The_Real_JeffS at May 22, 2007 06:50 AMIt's a fine line...
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at May 22, 2007 07:13 AMI think John Edwards the candidate needs to contact John Edwards the psychic. That way he can find out what else from his past won't "play in Peoria" in the future.
Posted by: Julie at May 22, 2007 07:38 AMThey're not the same guy?
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at May 22, 2007 07:47 AMNo.
John Edwards the psychic stands in front of 50 people and says "Does anyone know anyone who has the first initial 'J'?"
John Edwards the candidate stands in front of 1800 people and says, "Poverty sucks. Now, SHOW ME THE MONEEEEEYYYYY!!"
"Does anyone know anyone who has the first initial 'J'?"
The dude's on "Sesame Street"?
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at May 22, 2007 08:06 AMIt astounds me, the number of people who will pay money to this clown (the psychic clown, not the politician clown), just so they can feel secure that Granny's in heaven. If you have ever watched the movie "Leap of Faith", you know how the con works. I mean, lets face it: if he's so all-knowing, why doesn't he just conjure up the Lotto numbers and retire?
Posted by: Julie at May 22, 2007 08:10 AMI'm still chuckling about how Miss Cleo didn't see that bankruptcy coming.
Posted by: Ken S, Fifth String on the Banjo of Life at May 22, 2007 08:27 AMSouth Park did a great fisking of Edwards (psychic) in their episode: The Biggest Douche in the Universe.
Posted by: Cullen at May 22, 2007 08:37 AMWell, I'm pretty sure the irony zips by Edwards faster than a $400 haircut. I didn't realize proselytizing on reducing poverty paid so well. I thought all the big bucks were in Global Warming.
Posted by: Dave E. at May 22, 2007 09:13 AMI think my favorite comment over there was, "$55,000 is only about 120 haircuts. that doesnt [sic] sound like much money at all."
Posted by: Kate P at May 22, 2007 12:07 PMHey Ken, Emily!!
Have you seen Bill Whittle's update?
http://www.ejectejecteject.com/
Posted by: Sharon Ferguson at May 22, 2007 08:55 PMI'm not going to defend John Edwards (though I have in the past, mainly for the hair cut), but you'd think there would have been someone among his staff who would have pulled him aside and said, "ya know, this probably isn't the best of ideas."
As for the 7% tuition increase, two points: 1. rates were cut way low a few years back (mainly when I was in college) while the state was soaking in the Silicon Valley money; 2. it's still a helluva lot cheaper than private school; and as a bonus 3. there's so much financial aide out there that I doubt many of the students will even notice the increase
Posted by: KG at May 22, 2007 10:23 PMI think I actually hate John Edwards. I can't say that about any of the other candidates in the Democratic field.
Posted by: Tainted Bill at May 23, 2007 06:02 AMSad that the Democrat presidential race is between three far-left radicals. I wish Mr. Lieberman woudl throw his hat in the ring, just to make things interesting.
Fred Thompson should jump in on the Republican side, and bill himself as the candidate who spends the least on hair care :-)
Posted by: Alan K. Henderson. civility coach for Ann Coulter and Bill Maher at May 23, 2007 05:21 PMGood news for you Alan, Richardson is in the race... rumor is he actually owns a gun and wouldn't try to take everyone else's guns away.
Posted by: KG at May 23, 2007 06:48 PM